From Paris to Shanghai: The Same Project, Two Different Views of Time

Author: Jingjing Yu, Yiran Xing Updated 47 mins ago (GMT+8)

In Europe-China industrial cooperation, misunderstandings often start with time. Chinese companies may see European decision-making as slow. European companies may see Chinese execution as rushed. Yet very often, neither side is wrong. They are responding rationally to different ecosystems, different levels of system interdependence and different views of risk.

france

Over the years, I have repeatedly heard the same two statements.

In Shanghai: “French companies move too slowly.”

In Paris: “Chinese companies are always in a hurry.”

What I find interesting is that both sides genuinely believe they are being rational. Both are trying to make the project succeed. Yet both often end up frustrated with each other.

After working on industrial projects between Europe and China for many years, I have come to a different conclusion: neither side is wrong. They simply operate under different perceptions of time.

The Chinese Perspective: Speed Creates Opportunity

Many Chinese companies grew up in an environment defined by rapid growth. Markets expanded quickly. Supply chains evolved quickly. Competition intensified quickly.

In such an environment, speed became a competitive advantage. The underlying logic is simple:

·    Identify an opportunity.

·    Move quickly.

·    Adjust along the way.

·    Solve problems as they emerge.

When market windows can open and close within months, excessive caution can become a risk in itself. For many Chinese executives, delaying a decision often feels more dangerous than making an imperfect one.

The European Perspective: Stability Creates Value

In Europe, and particularly in industrial sectors, the context is different. Many companies have been operating for decades, sometimes for more than a century.

Their priority is not only to maximize next year’s growth, but more importantly to ensure long-term continuity.

As a result, decisions are often evaluated through a different lens:

·    What are the long-term consequences?

·    What risks does this create?

·    What happens if we need to reverse course?

What appears as slow decision-making from the outside is often a deliberate effort to preserve stability.

The Ecosystem Matters

This is where I believe many misunderstandings begin.

China offers one of the world’s most dynamic environments for experimentation. The market is large. The industrial base is deep. Companies can often adapt quickly and continuously refine their strategy.

Europe’s industrial landscape works differently. From the first business plan, a project is often embedded into a broader ecosystem involving industrial partners, banks or lenders, institutional investors, offtakers, and sometimes even public authorities, and labor representatives.

Together, these stakeholders form the project ecosystem. They are not external observers. Their decisions can affect financing, construction, operations, procurement, employment and public legitimacy.

When a Small Change Becomes a Systemic Issue

From a Chinese company’s perspective, certain changes may appear to be normal business decisions: changing the investment amount, modifying the technology route, changing a partner or the schedule.

In a European project structure, however, such changes can generate consequences across the entire system. A project is usually built on a negotiated balance of risks, responsibilities and expectations.

Once financing structures are agreed and lenders sign their covenants, it usually means that multiple stakeholders have reached a shared understanding of the project’s balance and risk allocation.

At that stage, even a seemingly small change can trigger significant consequences across the entire structure.

In other words: the ecosystem matters. 

Case 1: Environment Assessment Is Not Only a Technical Process

One example is environment assessment. When Chinese companies consider building factories in Europe, they often find environment assessments, public consultations and administrative procedures difficult to understand, sometimes even excessive.

From a business execution perspective, I can understand this reaction. Some procedures can indeed feel cumbersome or overly cautious.

But stopping at the conclusion that “Europe is inefficient” misses the deeper political and legal logic behind these processes.

European political culture is built on elections, local representation and public participation. An industrial project is not only a business arrangement between a company and public authorities. It may affect residents, farmers, environmental organizations, municipalities, local employment, traffic flows, water use, emissions, landscape and regional identity.

In such an environment, any stakeholder who believes its interests may be affected can raise concerns through public consultation, administrative review, legal procedures or public debate. For the project owner, these are not merely external noise. They are part of implementation risk.

This is why environment assessment is not simply a technical document. It is part of the process through which an industrial project obtains local social acceptance. If mishandled, it can later create legal disputes, delays, cost overruns and weaker confidence among financiers and partners.

Case 2: The Real Life Lesson after Distressed Acquisitions

Another typical situation appears in acquisitions, especially distressed or bankruptcy-related acquisitions. For some Chinese companies, acquiring an European company can look like a fast way to obtain brands, technologies, customers, licenses, teams and local channels.

After the transaction closes, the parent company may provide capital support, liquidity assistance or order synergies. Senior management teams may also establish regular communication. 

In real life, beyond senior management interaction, the actual relationship between parent company and subsidiary remains largely limited to financial support.

However, a distressed company can only regain its financial independence by re-entering the local profit-generating ecosystem. This means rebuilding customer trust, renegotiating supplier terms, stabilizing employees, improving cost structures, adapting to local sales cycles and regaining credibility within the industry network.

Therefore, post-acquisition, the real turning point comes when the parent company helps the subsidiary re-embed itself in the local value chain, rather than treating it simply as an overseas asset.

This is one of the most underestimated aspects of Chinese acquisitions in Europe: buying the company is only the beginning. Re-entering and activating the local ecosystem is where post-acquisition value creation truly begins. 

It Is Not About Efficiency

This is why I no longer like the simplistic statement: “French companies are inefficient.”

Very often, the issue is not efficiency. The issue is system complexity.

Chinese companies frequently optimize for speed. European industrial ecosystems frequently optimize for resilience.

These are different objectives. And different objectives naturally produce different decision-making processes.

My Biggest Lesson

One of the biggest mistakes I see in Europe-China cooperation is that both sides often interpret a difference in time horizons as a difference in competence.

Chinese companies sometimes see caution as inefficiency. European companies sometimes see speed as recklessness.

In reality, both are often responding rationally to the environments that shaped them.

The most successful cross-border partnerships are not the ones where one side adopts the other’s approach. They are the ones where both sides understand why the other thinks differently.

Disclaimer:

 The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any employing firm or its affiliates.


About Author:

Ms. Jingjing Yu is based in Paris, France, and has over 18 years of experience in China-Europe cross-border business development. She has long been engaged in China-Europe industrial cooperation, cross-border investment, and the globalization of Chinese companies, with extensive practical experience in industrial investment, strategic partnerships, greenfield investment, cross-border M&A, and market expansion.


Contact Us:

Xingyiran@iyiou.com

yiran.png.png